Pages

Showing posts with label Islam Issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islam Issues. Show all posts

Monday, September 14, 2009

The Muslim Question Revisited (10)

This is the endof a 10-part series about Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Hagar, Ishmael, Jews, Arabs, Muslims, and the specific role of Islam in the book of Revelation. God willing, these articles will one day be published in book form.

In Parts 8 and 9, we discovered that the majority of mainline Protestant scholars from the time of the Reformation into the 1800's almost unanimously discerned the conquests of Arabic Islam in the fulfillment of Revelation's 5th trumpet, and those of Turkish Islam in the 6th trumpet. The book of Revelation plainly identifies the 5th and 6th trumpets as the first and second of three successive "woes" (see Revelation 8:13; 9:12). If those ancient Protestant were right, then it's logical to expect a resurgence of radical Islam as "the third woe" right before the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

After "the second woe," John wrote:

  • The second woe is past. Behold, the third woe is coming quickly. Then the seventh angel sounded: And there were loud voices in heaven, saying, "The kingdoms of this world have become the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ, and He shall reign forever and ever!" (Revelation 11:14-15)

Notice how "the third woe" is mentioned immediately before "the seventh angel" sounds and Jesus Christ takes over "the kingdoms of this world." It is my solemn belief that the time of the dreaded "third woe" has arrived.

The website, www.radicalislam.org, contains of a wealth of information about the current threat. Its homepage declares:

  • Today we are threatened by organizations without borders. Attacks can take place anywhere in the world at any time, by terror organizations headquartered in the Middle East, or right under our noses. In many cases terror organizations are plotting attacks for years, without us having any advanced knowledge.

One common thread in the global threats we face is the connection to Radical Islam.

These threats reinvent themselves everyday. The fear of not knowing what, where, when, how or who will be hit next is the greatest success for terrorists.

Sharia law threatens freedoms that Americans hold dear. The nuclear threat hanging over our heads endangers our very existence.

  • Following in the footsteps of Mohammed himself who conquered Arabia with the sword, radical Islam is dedicated to the conquest of the world. Films like "Obsession: The War of Radical Islam against the West" and "The Third Jihad" are both instructive and frightening. They reveal shocking facts about "Allah's Army," an army most Americans know little about.

In the light of Revelation's prediction about "the third woe," I can't help but wonder whether some future terrorist attack - economic, chemical, or nuclear - will become of catalyst for the initiation of earth's final events as predicted in the Bible? Believe me, the possibility is real.

Yet as stated in previous articles, the vast majority of our planet's 1.3 billion Muslims aren't terrorists. Millions are mild moderates. Others are energetic reformers. Still others are confused searchers seeking deliverance from sin. In a nutshell, most are wandering sons and daughters of Ishmael longing for a relationship with the God of Abraham. Their Creator loves them all, whether they are radicals, or regulars. Signficantly, the book of Revelation predicts that at the very time when "the third woe" sounds, "the everlasting gospel" will also be preached "to those who dwell on the earth—to every nation, tribe, tongue, and people" (Revelation 14:6) right before the return of Jesus Christ (see verses 14-16). Thus, while "the third woe" sounds, the Holy Spirit "woos" one last time.

This is the time of the woe and woo.

Are we listening?

In the first century A.D., Saul the Pharisee was a Jewish terrorist fueled by hatred against Christians (see Acts 7:58; 8:3), which tells us that it is possible to be a Muslim terrorist, or a Jewish terrorist. Yet on the road to Damascus, Saul met a Savior who loved him still (read Acts 9). Jesus blinded him, then enlightened him, and then transformed him into one of the most powerful Christian evangelists our world has ever seen.

Such transformations are still happening in our day.

The bottom line of this entire 10-part series is that we are living just before Jesus Christ returns and that God is now sending one more final burst of "gospel" light (see Revelation 14:6 and 18:1) toward all Jews, all Arabs, all Muslims, and everyone else, before "the harvest of the earth is ripe" (see Revelation 14:15). Truly, the Lord wants every one of us in His kingdom.

May God help us all to be true sons of Abraham who, when we discover the infinite grace of "the Savior of the world" (1 John 4:14) are willing to kneel low at the foot of His cross, having love for all, and hatred for none.

The Muslim Question Revisited (9)

In Part 8 we learned that mainline Protestant commentators (such as John Calvin, Albert Barnes, John Wesley, and Charles Spurgeon) from the 1500s to the 1800s applied the details of the 5th trumpet of Revelation 9 to the historical conquests of Mohammed and his desert warriors. For proof, simply do an Internet search for the PDF document, Islam in the Bible, by Presbyterian scholar Dr. Francis Nigel Lee. This is the Historicist view, not Preterist or Futurist.

The book of Revelation identifies the last three trumpets as "woes" to fall upon the earth. After the first four trumpets sound in Revelation 8, John wrote,
  • Woe, woe, woe, to the inhabitants of the earth by reason of the other voices of the trumpet of the three angels, which are yet to sound! (Revelation 8:13, emphasis added)

Immediately following this warning, the 5th trumpet sounds (Revelation 9:1-11), containing the first woe. Immediately after this, John wrote, "One woe is past; and, behold, there come two woes more hereafter" (Revelation 9:12). Then comes the 6th trumpet, containing the second woe. To this we will now turn our attention (in Part 10 of this series - the grand finale - we will zero in on the 3rd and final woe predicted to hit planet Earth right before the Second Coming of Jesus Christ).

Concerning the 6th trumpet, John wrote:

  • (9:13) And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God, (9:14) Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates. (9:15) And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men. (9:16) And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand: and I heard the number of them. (9:17) And thus I saw the horses in the vision, and them that sat on them, having breastplates of fire, and of jacinth, and brimstone: and the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions; and out of their mouths issued fire and smoke and brimstone. (9:18) By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths. (9:19) For their power is in their mouth, and in their tails: for their tails were like unto serpents, and had heads, and with them they do hurt. (9:20) And the rest of the men which were not killed by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils, and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk: (9:21) Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts (Revelation 9:13-21).

Here "four angels" are described as being "loosed" to slay "the third part of men." Protestant Historicists applied this to "the third part" of the Roman Empire, that is, to its eastern portion, centered in Constantinople. The period, "an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year," they interpreted based on the day-for-a-year principle (see Numbers 14:34; Ezekiel 4:6). In doing the math, we discover that "a day" is 1 year, "a year" is 360 years (based on 360 days in a Jewish calendar year), "a month" is 30 years (based on 30 days in a Jewish month), and "an hour" is 15 days (1/24th of a 24-hour day, and 1/24th of 360 days).

360 years + 30 years + 1 year + 15 days = 391 years and 15 days.

Can we find a fulfillment for this period? Yes, we can!

The previous "five months" (or 150-year period), predicted in the 5th trumpet (Revelation 9:10) began when Ottoman the Turk became the first "king" (see Revelation 9:11) over the disorganized Islamic countries, uniting them under one central government. That period extended from July 27, 1299, to July 27, 1449. During those 150 years, Turkish Islam sought to "slay" (or eliminate) the eastern sovereignty of a "third" of the Roman Empire, but was unable to do so. It could only "hurt" (Revelation 9:10). Four years later, on May 29, 1453, Constantinople fell to the Turks.

Prior to this, on the exact date noted - July 27, 1449 - the Greek Emperor, Constantine XIII, acknowledged that he no longer ruled by his own authority, but by consent of the Turks. In other words, his sovereignty was over. Now do the math. 391 years and 15 days starting from July 27, 1449 leads to August 11, 1840. Based on what happened July 27, 1449, historicist prophecy students in the 1830s publicly proclaimed before the event occurred that on August 11, 1840, the independence of the Ottoman sultans ruling in Constantinople would cease.

Amazingly, that's exactly what happened. On "Aug. 11, 1840, the very day to which the time marked in the prophecy continued … the authority of the Turkish Empire passed into the hands of the Powers of Europe [Britain, Russia, Austria, and Prussia]" (The Great Nations of Today, by Alonzo T. Jones, p. 77, Review and Herald Publishing Co., Battle Creek, MI. 1901).

The very power (Ottoman Islam based in Turkey), whose seemingly innumerable warriors (see Revelation 9:16) rode on "horses" (see Revelation 9:17) giving the appearance of have "mouths [that] issued fire and smoke and brimstone" (because they used rifles and firepower in their conquest of Constantinople), submitted its sovereignty to the Christian powers of Europe at the end of the exact time period predicted in Revelation 9:15.

Every detail of the prophecy of Revelation 9:13-21 can't be explained in this short article, but as stated before, if you do your homework you will discover that Protestant Historicists discerned the conquests of Arabic Islam as a fulfillment of the 5th trumpet ("the first woe"), and those of Turkish Islam as a fulfillment of the 6th trumpet ("the second woe"). If their interpretation is correct - which I believe it is - then it's logical to expect a resurgence of radical Islam as "the third woe" right before the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

Open your eyes.

It's happening right now.

Conclusion pending…

The Muslim Question Revisited (8)

In this lengthy series on Arabs, Muslims, and Islam, it's finally time to focus on the book of Revelation. As noted in my last article, Revelation chapter nine solemnly predicts:
  • Then the fifth angel sounded: And I saw a star fallen from heaven to the earth. To him was given the key to the bottomless pit. And he opened the bottomless pit, and smoke arose out of the pit like the smoke of a great furnace. So the sun and the air were darkened because of the smoke of the pit. Then out of the smoke locusts came upon the earth. And to them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power… The shape of the locusts was like horses prepared for battle. On their heads were crowns of something like gold, and their faces were like the faces of men. They had hair like women's hair, and their teeth were like lions' teeth. And they had breastplates like breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots with many horses running into battle (Revelation 9:1-3, 7-9, emphasis added).

E.B. Elliot penned one of the most revered Bible commentaries on the book of Revelation ever written. The legendary Charles Spurgeon once referred to Elliot's commentary, called Horae Apocalypticae, as "the standard work." First published in 1862, Elliot's commentary reflects the mainstream thoughts of Protestant scholars from the time of John Calvin (1500s) to the 19th century. In his analysis of the fifth and sixth trumpet blasts of Revelation 9, Elliot is exceedingly clear that these prophecies apply to Mohammed and his warriors.

First, let's notice what Elliot called "the zoology" of the Bible. God often uses animals or plants to represent peoples or nations, and when He does, those plants and animals are geographically specific to the territories that those nations inhabit. For example, God called Israel "a vine" (Psalms 80:8) because her territory was full of vineyards. In Daniel 7, ancient Babylon was represented as "a lion" (Daniel 7:4), Persia as a "bear" (verse 5), and Greece as "a leopard" (verse 6) because lions, bears, and leopards were all well known throughout the mountains, plains, and forests of Babylon, Persia, and Greece.

What about "locusts" and "scorpions"?

One of the ten plagues upon the Egyptians occurred when Moses stretched out his rod and "an east wind brought the locusts" (Exodus 10:13). East of Egypt is Arabia, and its barren land is a notable home for both locusts and scorpions. Thus the application of the prophecy of Revelation 9 to the territory of Arabia makes perfect sense. The biblical zoology fits, as noted by Elliot.

Space doesn't allow a detailed explanation of every verse in Revelation 9, or of the details of Mohammed's highly controversial history, but I will cover some highlights, with a bit of background.

In 538 A.D. the eastern Roman Emperor Justinian issued his famous decree giving the Pope total political power in Europe. The papacy was rising in the west, and Christianity was tobogganing into "the Dark Ages." Idolatry, corruption, immorality, and apostasy teemed everywhere, even inside the professed churches of Jesus Christ.

32 years later, in 570 A.D., Mohammed was born.

Especially after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the religion of Islam, and especially the character of Mohammed, has been scrutinized like never before. I've read many books and articles on this subject, and still have much to learn, yet there's no doubt that Mohammad was a bold desert warrior who advanced his cause with the sword. Like a ferocious "east wind," his movement swept across desert sands in the 7th century, and during the short period from 622 A.D. (the official start of Mohammed's career when he fled Mecca) to 632 A.D., nearly all of Arabia fell under his sway.

Here's a quick commentary on Revelation 9:

  • Verse 1: Many commentators have applied the phrase, "a star fallen," to Satan and Islamic leaders who cruelly served his purposes.
  • Verse 2: "The bottomless pit" can easily refer to a barren, desolate region, such as the lands of Arabia. The "smoke" that darkened "the sun and the air" has been applied to many of Mohammed's doctrines that obscure "the sun" (the true light of Jesus Christ, see Rev. 1:16) and "the air" (the fresh air of freedom, see 2 Cor. 3:17).
  • Verse 3: The "locusts" and "scorpions" have been applied by many Protestant commentators (Calvin, Barnes, Wesley, Spurgeon, Elliot, etc.) to the armies of Mohammed in their wars of conquest.
  • Verses 4,5: A "command" and "authority" was mysteriously "given" to these ferocious armies only against those without "the seal of God in their foreheads." In other words, authority was given to them as a scourge against apostate Christianity similar to the authority granted to King Nebuchadnezzar against ancient Israel when she wickedly departed from the ways of God (read Jeremiah 25:8-11).
  • Verse 5: During the fifth trumpet, Islamic warriors were granted authority for "five months." Dates for this period vary somewhat, but most Protestant commentators (1500s-1800s) applied the day-for-a-year principle to this prophecy (see Nu. 14:34 and Ezek. 4:6), making this 150 literal years (30 days in a Hebrew month x 5) of aggressive Islamic warfare against Constantinople, the capital city of the eastern Roman Empire. During that period (often dated from 1299-1449 A.D., starting when Ottoman first became "king" - see Rev. 9:11 - over Turkish Islam), the eastern Roman Empire was savagely tormented, but not "kill[ed]." That is, it remained in existence while Constantinople still remained under Eastern Roman control.
  • Verses 7-9: This symbolism is amazingly accurate in its description of both the appearance and dress of Turkish Muslim warriors. They wore "gold" (gold colored, yellow turbans), had "hair like women's hair" (it was characteristically long), were extremely ferocious (like "lions teeth"), literally wore "breastplates of iron," and rode "horses" as they rushed "into battle."

Thus, point-by-point, an Islamic application of the inspired symbolism of the 5th trumpet ("the first woe," see Rev. 9:12) fits the facts of history. Two more "woes" remain to be studied, bringing us down to our own time. May God help us not to be blinded by Preterist and Futurist fantasies so we can perceive Revelation's prophecies being fulfilled right before our eyes!

One more thing: the vast majority of modern Muslims aren't locust-like, or scorpion-like. As stated before, they long to live in peace, just like we do.

But the Jihadists, that's another story…

To be continued…

The Muslim Question Revisited (7)

In Part 8 of this series (coming next), I will examine the book of Revelation and the role of Islam in prophecy. But before doing this, I want to highlight a controversial promise God originally made to Abram. The Lord told His servant:
  • I will bless those who bless you,
  • And I will curse him who curses you;
  • And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed (Genesis 12:3, emphasis added)

Evangelical scholars today often apply this verse exclusively to Israel. "Those who bless Israel will be blessed," many contend, "and those who curse Israel will be cursed." Yet notice this: First, the word "Israel" is absent from this text. Second, its main point is that through Abraham "all the families of the earth shall be blessed." Third, this prediction is both Messianic and inclusive, that is, it predicts a special blessing coming through Abraham's genealogical line to "all the families of the earth." Fourth, that blessing comes through Jesus Christ, the Promised One.

In other words, God's main purpose in calling Abraham, in miraculously bringing forth Isaac, in raising up Jacob and his sons, in delivering the Hebrew nation from cruel Egyptian slavery, and in mercifully preserving the Israelites throughout Old Testament history - in spite of their many sins - was to eventually bring forth through their line His royal Messiah, Jesus Christ, who came to bless everyone with His gift of salvation.

Matthew Henry comments:

  • In thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed. This was the promise that crowned all the rest; for it points at the Messiah, in whom all the promises are yea and amen.[1]

The entire Bible points forward to this Messiah. From Abel's first offering of a lamb outside the gates of Eden (see Gen. 4:4), to the Passover blood sprinkled on Egyptian doors (see Ex. 12:13), to the slaughter of animals for over a thousand years on Jewish altars - every sacrifice pointed forward to the Supreme Sacrifice, to the Living Water, to Heaven's Lamb, and to salvation through faith in Him alone. Truly, salvation is "the gift of God, not of works, lest any man should boast" (Ephesians 2:8), and it is available to the entire world (see John 3:16).

Before advancing to Revelation, let's take one more look at God's original "count the stars…so shall your descendants be" promise to Abram in Genesis 15:5. As stated before, from a strictly genealogical perspective, Abraham does have lots of great-great-great-great-great-great grandchildren through both Ishmael and Isaac, which include both Jews and Arabs. Yet in the New Testament, Paul clarified a truth of deep significance when he wrote: "Therefore know that only those who are of faith are sons of Abraham" (Galatians 3:7, emphasis added). Here Paul moves beyond rigid genealogical lineage, and describes what might be called "faith lineage." "Only those who are of faith," the inspired writer declared, "are [true] sons of Abraham."

In other words, from God's perspective, only those who have faith in Him and trust His Word, like Abraham did, are the patriarch's real children. Because of this Faith Factor, it is entirely possible for Abraham to be the spiritual father of believing Jews, believing Arabs, and anyone else who loses confidence in human flesh, renounces sin, and trusts the Savior. Those who do so are all God's shiny "stars" amidst the world's dark night, the sons of Abraham.

Thus in the ultimate sense, the God of the Bible is not exclusive, but embracing. He created us all, and loves us all. And because of His compassionate heart, His goal has always been that Abraham, Sarah, Hagar, Isaac, Ishmael, and as many of their descendants as possible would eventually sit down at the same table in His Heavenly Kingdom as brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ.

"Not if I can help it," snarls Lucifer.

Sadly, throughout history, the Devil has been amazingly successful in his warfare against God's plans. He started with the subtle whispering of a snake in Eden, which led Adam and Eve into sin (see Gen. 3:1-5). In Noah's day he corrupted an entire world until it needed to be cleansed by a flood. Traveling beyond Abraham's time, the Old Testament plainly teaches that he also infected Isaac's line - the people of Israel - with apostasy and idolatry (see Exodus 32, etc). Understandably, his sophistry has permeated Ishmael's descendants, too.

In New Testament times, Satan's insidious lies even infiltrated the professed Church of Jesus Christ, fulfilling Paul's cryptic prediction that many would "depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons" (1 Timothy 4:1).

In graphic language, the book of Revelation not only describes this very apostasy, but also some unusual providential efforts to counteract it. Strangely enough, these efforts included the fierce armies of an Arab named Mohammed, a man who unquestionably exhibited the wild side of Ishmael.

The 9th chapter of the book of Revelation predicts:

  • Then the fifth angel sounded: And I saw a star fallen from heaven to the earth. To him was given the key to the bottomless pit. And he opened the bottomless pit, and smoke arose out of the pit like the smoke of a great furnace. So the sun and the air were darkened because of the smoke of the pit. Then out of the smoke locusts came upon the earth. And to them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power… The shape of the locusts was like horses prepared for battle. On their heads were crowns of something like gold, and their faces were like the faces of men. They had hair like women's hair, and their teeth were like lions' teeth. And they had breastplates like breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots with many horses running into battle (Revelation 9:1-3, 7-9).

Locusts and scorpions are desert creatures. Does this mysterious prophecy have anything to do with Mohammed and his desert warriors?

You'll find out in Part 8!

To be continued…

The Muslim Question Revisited (6)

Part 5 in this series about Arabs, Jews, Jesus Christ, Islam and Bible prophecy found Hagar and Ishmael apparently forsaken by God and man and left to die in the desert. Their meager provisions had run out, Ishmael was weeping, and Hagar assumed they would both perish shortly. But the Lord had other plans. Marvelously, the Bible reports:
  • Then God opened her [Hagar's] eyes, and she saw a well of water. And she went and filled the skin with water, and gave the lad a drink (Genesis 21:19, emphasis added).

The text says, "God opened her eyes," showing divine enlightenment. As I ponder the Lord's merciful act toward Hagar the Egyptian, the Holy Spirit strongly impresses me that this is what God longs to do today for every descendent of Ishmael, every descendant of Isaac, and also for every lost sinner. He wants to open all of our eyes and to lead us away from works, to faith in Him. Even more significantly, the verse informs us that after God opened Hagar's eyes, "she saw a well of water." The Nelson Study Bible comments:

  • God showed a well of water. How fitting that the promise of God would again be beside a provision of water (see 16:7, 14). Often in the pages of the Old Testament, a spring or well of water is a symbol of spiritual salvation as well as physical deliverance (see Is. 12:3; Jer. 2:13). [1]

Jesus Christ plainly used water as a symbol of salvation through faith in Him. In His conversation with a non-Jewish outcast Samaritan woman of ill-repute, "Jesus answered and said to her, 'If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, Give Me a drink, you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water'" (John 4:10, emphasis added). Christ Himself was that "living water," which He freely offered to this thirsty soul.

Therefore when the Bible states that "God opened" Hagar's eyes, and that He "showed" her "a well of water," this could easily be illustrative of His ongoing desire to lead her, and her seed, away from works, to full salvation through faith in "the Savior of the world" (John 4:14).

The narrative in Genesis 21 about Hagar and Ishmael ends this way:

  • So God was with the lad; and he grew and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer. He dwelt in the Wilderness of Paran; and his mother took a wife for him from the land of Egypt (Genesis 21:8-21).

Thus Hagar and her son didn't perish after all. Instead, they lived on, as the Lord had promised. Eventually Ishmael fathered "twelve princes" (see Genesis 17:20; 25:12-18) whose descendants became the Arab world. We must ask, why "twelve"? Interestingly enough, Jacob had twelve sons too, which became the twelve tribes of Israel! The Nelson Study Bible comments:

  • As the Hebrew people would have twelve tribes, so Ishmael's people would also have twelve families (25:12-18). [2]

Thus there seems to be some sort of providential orchestration behind the fact that both Ishmael's line and Isaac's line branched out into precisely "twelve" directions. Such a phenomena suggests a distinctly separate, and yet somewhat parallel history. Here's the entire quote from Genesis 25:12-18:

  • Now this is the genealogy of Ishmael, Abraham's son, whom Hagar the Egyptian, Sarah's maidservant, bore to Abraham. And these were the names of the sons of Ishmael, by their names, according to their generations: The firstborn of Ishmael, Nebajoth; then Kedar, Adbeel, Mibsam, Mishma, Dumah, Massa, Hadar, Tema, Jetur, Naphish, and Kedemah. These were the sons of Ishmael and these were their names, by their towns and their settlements, twelve princes according to their nations. These were the years of the life of Ishmael: one hundred and thirty-seven years; and he breathed his last and died, and was gathered to his people. (They dwelt from Havilah as far as Shur, which is east of Egypt as you go toward Assyria.) He died in the presence of all his brethren (Genesis 25:12-18).

Notice that last sentence, "He died in the presence of all his brethren." Remember the Angel of the Lord's original prediction that Ishmael would be "a wild man"? His last words to Hagar were, "And he [Ishmael] shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren" (Genesis 16:12). Who were Ishmael's "brethren"? The word "brethren" doesn't apply to Ishmael's relationship with his own twelve sons, but rather to his relationship to Isaac and his twelve sons. They were all "brethren," which literally means "brothers." Notice how The Nelson Study Bible applies this "brethren" concept not only to Ishmael and Isaac directly, but also to their descendants:

  • Ishmael and his descendants … would dwell in the presence of all his brethren. This has indeed been the case, for Ishmael's descendants are the Arab peoples who populate most of the Middle East today. Very few of the peoples of the Old Testament world have survived to our own day…But two peoples survive: Israel, the Jewish people, descended from Isaac; and the Arabs, descended from Ishmael (see 17:19-22). [3]

According to this statement, the "two peoples" who are "brethren" or "brothers" are "the Jewish people, descended from Isaac; and the Arabs, descended from Ishmael." "But Ishmael was a wild man," some Jews might say, "and so are his descendants! It's the Arabs fault we can't get along, not ours!" Well…I'll let the Lord be the judge of that. No doubt both groups have their faults; but my point is that, based on God's Word, Israelites and Arabs are genealogical "brothers" still. We should also remember that Ishmael's wild temperament is not the sum total of either the man, or his descendants. Don't forget that Ishmael was also raised by Abraham himself, was given a name by God Himself, has a name which means, "The Lord hears," and was also "blessed" by the great Creator of heaven and earth. While the Bible clearly reveals that the Lord worked most markedly in behalf of Isaac's line (in the Exodus, the giving of the Ten Commandments, the history of Israel, etc), Ishmael's line was not forsaken.

The truth is that throughout history God has been working with both lines, and He is working with both lines today, if we are willing to see His hand.

To be continued…

Sunday, September 13, 2009

The Muslim Question Revisited (5)

Christians often contend that God's favor now rests upon Jews (the descendants of Isaac), instead of Arabs (the descendants of Ishmael), and they based their conclusions on the Bible. But as we saw in Parts 1-4 of this series, the very Bible that Christians quote also reveals many unexpected twists and turns that are often overlooked.

So let's keep digging.

When Abraham finally discovered that God's primary promise would be fulfilled through Sarah and Isaac, rather than through Hagar and Ishmael, he blurted out in anguish before the Lord, "Oh, that Ishmael might live before You!" (Genesis 17:18) God's response to this fatherly plea must be fully considered. If we note only half of His response, we'll end up with a half-truth. Someone once said, "Beware of half-truths. You may end up with the wrong half!" In the light of this excellent counsel, let's take a close look at God's full response to Abraham's inquiry, which includes a prophecy about Ishmael.

That response is recorded in Genesis 17:19-21. First, as we've already noted, the Lord did indeed clarify that His primary promise would flow through Sarah, not Hagar (verse 19). He also reiterated the same truth in verse 21. That settles it, right? Well, not exactly, because sandwiched right in the middle of these two Isaac-pronouncements are some key statements about Ishmael too, which must not be ignored.

See for yourself:

Then God said: "No, Sarah your wife shall bear you a son, and you shall call his name Isaac; I will establish My covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his descendants after him (verse 19). And as for Ishmael, I have heard you. Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly. He shall beget twelve princes, and I will make him a great nation (verse 20). But My covenant I will establish with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear to you at this set time next year" (verse 21). Then He finished talking with him, and God went up from Abraham (verse 22).

Did you catch that? Even though God's primary promise was to be fulfilled through Sarah and Isaac, Ishmael wasn't rejected. First of all, God told Abraham, "I have heard you." Heard what? The answer is: his plea that Ishmael might live before Him. The world famous Bible commentator, Matthew Henry, interprets this to mean, "kept in covenant with him." [1] In other words, Ishmael would still be under the Lord's special care, and neither would he be categorically excluded from covenantal blessings. Next, God said, "Behold, I have blessed him…" Does this sound like an unequivocal rejection notice? Hardly. Surprisingly, Ishmael would not be cursed, but blessed. Additionally, the Lord Himself personally promised to make Hagar's son "fruitful," to "multiply him exceedingly," to bring forth "twelve princes" out of him (more on this later), and even to "make him a great nation."

Quite a mouthful of promises, don't you think?

Now let's fast forward to Genesis 21. By this time, much to Sarah and Abraham's delight, Isaac had arrived, yet past tensions between the two moms continued simmering, until they finally reached the boiling point. On one particularly fateful occasion, "Abraham made a great feast on the same day that Isaac was weaned" (Genesis 21:8). Unfortunately, jealousy surged through Ishmael veins and his "wild" side surfaced toward his apparent rival - right during the feast! When "Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, scoffing" (verse 9), she was incensed. "Kick them out!" (see verse 10) she essentially pleaded with Abraham, "this is too much for me to take!"

What a dilemma for the old man. The record states: "And the matter was very displeasing in Abraham's sight because of his son" (verse 11). Abraham loved both Ishmael and Isaac (may God help us to love their descendants too), and he was at a loss what to do.

Then God spoke to him. "Do not let it be displeasing in your sight because of the lad or because of your bondwoman. Whatever Sarah has said to you, listen to her voice; for in Isaac your seed shall be called" (verse 12, emphasis added). Ah, that's it Steve! you may be thinking, Don't you see it? The promise flows through Isaac, not Ishmael! If these are your thoughts, don't worry, yes, I see it, and I believe it.

But the question remains, what about Ishmael?

Notice God's answer. In the very next verse He told Abraham, "Yet I will also make a nation of the son of the bondwoman, because he is your seed" (verse 13). Here the Lord not only repeats His previous promise that He would "make a nation" out of Ishmael, but He also specifically states that He Himself will do it. "I will also make a nation of the son of the bondwoman," said the Lord, "because he is your seed." This tells us that even though Ishmael was born the wrong way (by works, not faith), the Lord still recognized him, and had a plan for him, for Abraham's sake.

Obeying God's command to respect Sarah's plea, "Abraham rose early in the morning, and took bread and a skin of water; and putting it on her [Hagar's] shoulder, he gave it and the boy to Hagar, and sent her away. Then she departed and wandered in the Wilderness of Beersheba" (verse 14). Poor Hagar! Once again she found herself in the wilderness; but this time, there was no turning back.

Soon the bread-and-water provision Abraham had mercifully handed to the disinherited mother and child was used up, and the situation appeared hopeless. "And the water in the skin was used up, and she placed the boy under one of the shrubs. Then she went and sat down across from him at a distance of about a bowshot; for she said to herself, 'Let me not see the death of the boy.' So she sat opposite him, and lifted her voice and wept" (verses 15, 16).

This is it, Hagar thought, we're going to die.

And they would have. But God had other plans.

In Part 6 we will discover not only that the Bible says the Lord opened Hagar's eyes and showed her water in the wilderness (Genesis 21:19), but that that water represented His gracious offer of salvation through Jesus Christ.

May God open our eyes to His plans for both Jews and Arabs.

To be continued…

Saturday, September 12, 2009

The Muslim Question Revisited (4)

In October of 2008, White Horse Media produced a 13-part television series called Islam Revisited to challenge Christians to think more thoughtfully about sharing Jesus Christ was the world's 1.4 billion Muslims. Shortly thereafter, I began writing this series articles for Wisconsin Christian News, a Christian magazine. The response to both projects has been interesting. On one hand, I've received hostile letters from readers and viewers deriding me for being so "Muslim friendly." "You're in bed with snakes," snarled one WCN reader. On the other hand, we have received great encouragement from a different sort of folks. "I've been watching Revisiting Islam," wrote one man. "I worked with Muslims," he went on to explain, "and they were wonderful people. A glorious outreach. God's Blessings! Rodger."

Which group are you in?

Let's continue our foundation focus from the book of Genesis. Winston Churchill once commented, "The farther backward we look, the farther forward we can see." Surely this is true when it comes to the topic of Arabs, Muslims, and Jews.

In Genesis 17:7, God promised Abraham that He would make a special "covenant" with him and his descendants. In verses 9-13, the Lord specifically identifies "the sign" of this "covenant":
  • And God said to Abraham…This is My covenant which you shall keep…Every male child among you shall be circumcised… and it shall be a sign of the covenant between Me and you. He who is eight days old among you shall be circumcised…and My covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant" (Genesis 17:9-13).

Thus the "sign" of God's covenant (verse 11) was circumcision. In this light, it is vital to realize that right after Abraham received this counsel, and before Isaac was even conceived, guess who was among the very first to feel the knife on his foreskin? If you guessed "Ishmael," you deserve an A+, for this is exactly what the Bible says.

Take note:

  • So Abraham took Ishmael his son, all who were born in his house and all who were bought with his money, every male among the men of Abraham's house, and circumcised the flesh of their foreskins that very same day, as God had said to him. Abraham was ninety-nine years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin. And Ishmael his son was thirteen years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin. That very same day Abraham was circumcised, and his son Ishmael; and all the men of his house, born in the house or bought with money from a foreigner, were circumcised with him (Genesis 17:23-26).

These verses state three times that Abraham circumcised Ishmael. Apparently, the Holy Spirit wanted to make sure that we didn't miss this point. And when you compare Genesis 17:7 (which contains God's original offer to establish His "everlasting covenant" with both Abraham and his descendants) with verses 9-13 (which plainly identifies "circumcision" as the "sign" of that "covenant"), then it is irrefutably clear that 13-year-old Ishmael was brought under the umbrella of God's covenant too; that is, if words mean anything at all. This is not stretching facts, but stating them, according to the Scriptures.

Now let's focus on Isaac.

Immediately after God first spoke to Abraham about circumcision, He then gave the old man the shock of his life.

  • Then God said to Abraham, "As for Sarai your wife, you shall not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall be her name. And I will bless her and also give you a son by her; then I will bless her, and she shall be a mother of nations; kings of peoples shall be from her" (Genesis 17:15, 16).

What! Abraham thought to himself, Sarai… have a baby… in her old age? He couldn't imagine it. Yet it was destined to occur, for God Almighty predicted it. In the same breath the Lord changed Sarai's name, just like he previously changed her husband's name. She was now to be called "Sarah," which literally means, "princess," in spite of her wrinkles, grey hair, and sagging figure. She would be "a mother of nations" too.

As the full force of this revelation hit him, Abraham's eyes grew wide with amazement. The mother of God's promised child will be Sarah, not Hagar! At that exact moment thirteen joyful years of raising Ishmael must have flashed before his aging vision. Reeling with confusion, his fatherly heart blurted out, "Oh, that Ishmael might live before you!" (Genesis 17:18) But God was firm and refused to change His mind.

Then the Lord responded unequivocally,

  • "No, Sarah your wife shall bear you a son, and you shall call his name Isaac; I will establish My covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his descendants after him" (Genesis 17:19).

It is because of this statement that many think that God has categorically excluded both Ishmael and his descendants from His covenant, and from His promises. But as we have already seen, this isn't true, for the simple fact that Abraham circumcised Ishmael too, which brought him under the "sign of the covenant." Yet we must clarify that there definitely is a major difference between the birth of Ishmael, and that of Isaac. Ishmael was born because Abram and Sarai set out to help God fulfill His own promises. But the Lord didn't need any earthly assistance. What He promises, He can perform; that is, as long as men trust Him to do it.

There's a deep spiritual lesson here. In a parabolic sense, Ishmael's natural birth represents man impatiently performing his own works, whereas Isaac's supernatural birth represents God fulfilling His own word in His own time when man trusts Him to do it (Read carefully Galatians 4:22-31 and Romans 4:19-22).

But let's clarify something right here. Both Ishmael and Isaac had the option of learning that lesson, or rejecting it. So do both of their descendants - to this very day. In other words, no matter which original father a person stems from (Ishmael or Isaac) people on both sides (Arabs and Jews) have the option of choosing either works or faith.

Sadly, throughout history, millions on both sides have chosen works, instead of faith. But not all. Even today, God has His people who trust Him among Jews and Arabs, even if they don't understand everything.

Remember, it took Abraham a long time to get things straight.

To be continued…

The Muslim Question Revisited (3)

In Part 2 of this series we focused on a dynamic conversation in the wilderness between "the Angel of the Lord" and Hagar the Egyptian after she fled from her mistress Sarah because strife had developed between the two women. The Angel told Hagar that her child would be named "Ishmael," which means, "the Lord hears," and that He would "multiply" her "descendants exceedingly" (Genesis 16:9-11). Thus we concluded that God would somehow be involved in Ishmael's life, and in the lives of his descendants (the Arabs), in spite of their flaws.

Significantly, "the Angel of the Lord" also predicted about Ishmael,

  • He shall be a wild man;
  • His hand shall be against every man,
  • And every man's hand against him.
  • And he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren (Genesis 16:12)

"There's a Muslim for you!" people often say, "They're all wild and violent."

Let's discuss this. First, what the angel said about Ishmael was undoubtedly true, for God said it. Ishmael indeed had a "wild" side, and so do many of his descendants. But did the word "wild" apply to every aspect of Ishmael's life? And is it fair to apply such a turbulent disposition to all Arabs? How about to all Muslims?

Personally, I no longer think so.

Based on Genesis 16:9-12, it seems that Ishmael himself would have two sides to his character. First, he would have a spiritual, or "God side," which his name would bear witness to. But he would have a darker, "anti-God side" too, one that would literally drive him to be "against every man." Based on verses 11 and 12, it seems that these two sides would clash within Ishmael himself, in the same way that a similar conflict now rages between God and the Devil over every man's soul. And because verse 10 concerns not only Ishmael himself, but his "descendants" too, it makes sense that both the "God side" and the "wild side" would clash within Ishmael's offspring throughout history.

I will develop these points more extensively when we later examine the book of Revelation, the 5th and 6th trumpets, the "third woe," the September 11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, and Earth's final days.

But we have more to do first.

Obeying the angel, Hagar journeyed back to Abram's desert camp, and a few months later, her baby was born. The record simply states: "Abram was eighty-six years old when Hagar bore Ishmael to Abram" (see Genesis 16:16).

Thirteen years passed, during which time Ishmael advanced from babyhood, to boyhood, to youthful manhood. It's vital to realize that during this entire 13-year period, everyone within Abram's camp, including the old man himself, fully believed that young Ishmael was the child of promise. And Abram was a good father too, for the Lord later said of him,

For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the LORD, to do justice and judgment; that the LORD may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him (Genesis 18:19, KJV, emphasis added).

Yes, Abram was a good dad, and because Ishmael was his only child for thirteen long years, he must have given him a strong moral foundation. Not only that, but in the above verse God Himself testifies that Abram's children would "keep the way of the Lord." According to the text, Ishmael also must have kept "the way of the Lord," at least sometimes.

Now let's zero in on Genesis 17. Whether you realize it or not, that chapter is pivotal to the entire biblical story, and even to world history. It also has far reaching implications that affect all Arabs, all Jews, all Christians, and everyone else. It's also highly controversial, and must be studied carefully. If we fail to discern its message correctly, or misinterpret its statements, the result could be disastrous.

So let's tackle some of it, with God's help.

When Abram was 99 years old, and when Ishmael was thirteen, the Lord appeared again to the elderly patriarch. "Then Abram fell on his face: and God talked to him" (Genesis 17:3). Significantly, one of the first things God did during this encounter was to change Abram's name. "No longer shall your name be called Abram," the Almighty informed His servant, "but your name shall be Abraham; for I have made you a father of many nations" (verse 5).

Let's stop right here. Abram's new name, "Abraham," literally means, "father of a multitude." God also explained the meaning of that name when He further elaborated, "for I have made you a father of many nations." When we look at history - from a strictly genealogical perspective (we'll discuss the "faith perspective" later) - Abraham became exactly what the Lord predicted, a father of many nations. The descendants of his firstborn son, Ishmael, are the Arabs, and the descendants of his second son, Isaac, are the Jews. Now don't miss this key point: Abraham is the father of both groups, and the fact that God expanded Abram's name to "Abraham" and then said that he would be "a father of many nations" strongly implies that He recognized this.

Then in the very next verse, the Lord told Abraham,

And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you (Genesis 17:7).

One of the hottest questions of all is: Is this "covenant," which God said would make with Abraham and his "descendants," available to both groups (that is, to both Arabs and Jews), or to only one group? Personally, it seems to me now that it is at least available to both groups, especially considering the fact that Abraham had just been given a new name that meant "father of many nations," and because at the time when God first announced this, Abraham's only son was Ishmael. If this is the case, then the Lord's offer to "be God" to Abraham and his "descendants" means that He longs to "be God" to both Jews and Arabs.

The apostle Paul (a staunch Jew) later inquired, "is He the God of the Jews only? Is He not also the God of the Gentiles?" (Romans 3:29) Notice his answer: "Yes, of the Gentiles also" (verse 29). Thus, although the Bible often identifies God as "the God of Israel" (see Joshua 24:2), to state that He is "the God of the Jews only" is not correct. Paul, the Jew, said He is the God of non-Jews too.

Whatever you think of the term "Allah," the fact is that Paul himself stated that the God of the Bible is the God of both Jews and Gentiles, which would include the Arab world also.

Truly, the Lord is bigger than our small minds can grasp.

To be continued…

The Muslim Question Revisited (2)

It's no secret that Arabs and Jews have descended from two half-brothers, Ishmael (the father of the Arabs) and Isaac (the father of Israel) who, although they had different mothers (Hagar and Sarah), both had the same father (Abraham). In this series we will take a closer look at Ishmael, whose descendants are the Arabs, the majority of which now profess the religion of Islam. Just to clarify: modern Judaism has strayed from its biblical roots, and so have most Arabs. Nevertheless, God's Word still sheds light on their ancient beginnings.

One dark night God spoke to Abram (before his name was changed to Abraham) saying, "Look now toward heaven, and count the stars if you are able to number the…So shall your descendants be" (Genesis 15:6). Abram believed this promise, but in time he questioned exactly how it could be fulfilled, primarily because he and his wife Sarai were getting up in years. Acutely aware of her aging body, Sarai worried about the same thing too, and she eventually thought of a plan "to help God out of this pickle."

"Honey," Sarai might have whispered to Abram one quiet evening, "the Lord has restrained me from bearing children. Please, go in to my maid; perhaps I shall obtain children by her" (Genesis 16:2). As strange as this suggestion may appear to us today - especially coming from a godly man's wife - it wasn't so unusual in those bygone days. Sarai had a youthful Egyptian servant-girl named Hagar, and her maid seemed like the perfect vessel through which God could fulfill His promises.

Husbands should listen to their wives, right? (at least in most cases), and that's exactly what Abram did. "Okay," he essentially said, "I'll do it." Yet he had no idea how far-reaching the consequences of that single choice would be, or how much trouble it would cause, both in his own family, and throughout history, to this very day!

So Abram "went in to Hagar, and she conceived" (Genesis 16:4). But as the tiny fetus grew inside the Egyptian woman's body, so did unanticipated difficulties within Abram's household. As Hagar contemplated how she - and she alone - was carrying Abram's child, she yielded to temptation, exalted herself, and began despising Sarai. I'm carrying the heir, she thought proudly, the child of promise! Sensing her maid's haughty attitude, it didn't take long for Sarai to have a change of heart too. Oh, why did I suggest Hagar to my husband in the first place? she moaned. Before long, the two women were quarrelling like angry cats. "That Egyptian woman must go!" Sarai soon pleaded to her husband. And when "Sarai dealt harshly" with Hagar, the younger woman "fled from her presence" (Genesis 16:6).

Thus we can see that, even before Hagar's baby was born, conflict erupted over whether her child was to be a legitimate heir of God's promises or not. And as we shall soon see, the exact same conflict still rages today among Arabs, Jews, and Christians.

So Hagar "fled" from Abram's desert camp, to wander alone in the wilderness. Imagine how discouraged she must have felt. A few days earlier she was an esteemed wife of Abraham. Now she was homeless and friendless, and on top of that, pregnant! Yet unknown to her, a merciful, all-seeing eye watched her closely. After all, Hagar was still a wife of one of God's favorite humans. And she was carrying his child - his firstborn son. What happened next is deeply significant. Take a close look:

Now the Angel of the LORD found her [Hagar] by a spring of water in the wilderness, by the spring on the way to Shur. And He said, "Hagar, Sarai's maid, where have you come from, and where are you going?" She said, "I am fleeing from the presence of my mistress Sarai." The Angel of the LORD said to her, "Return to your mistress, and submit yourself under her hand." Then the Angel of the LORD said to her, "I will multiply your descendants exceedingly, so that they shall not be counted for multitude." And the Angel of the LORD said to her:

  • "Behold, you are with child,
  • And you shall bear a son.
  • You shall call his name Ishmael,
  • Because the LORD has heard your affliction.
    (Genesis 16:7-11)

Four times in these verses do we read that "the Angel of the Lord" talked to Hagar, which must mean that both she and her child have a place in God's plans. Upon careful examination, we discover that God made many predictions, or prophecies, concerning the child and his descendants. After a brief initial conversation, "the Angel of the Lord" told Hagar encouragingly, "I will multiply your descendants exceedingly, so that they shall not be counted for multitude."

Next, "the Angel of the Lord" informed Hagar that she would "bear a son," and that she should "call his name Ishmael." Now consider this: there are only four times in the entire Bible where God actually named a baby before it was born, and this is one of them. The first two times concern Abram's first two sons, Ishmael and Isaac (see also Genesis 17:19), and the other two times concern John the Baptist and Jesus Christ (see Luke 1:13,31). All Christians know the importance of Isaac, the Baptist, and above all, the Savior. But what about Ishmael? He must be important too.

If he weren't, God wouldn't have picked his name.

But what is even more significant is what that name means. The "Angel of the Lord" declared, "You shall call his name Ishmael, because the LORD has heard your affliction" (Genesis 16:11). "Ishmael" literally means, "the Lord hears," and because the name not only originated with God Himself, but also refers to God Himself, it makes sense that this very name must also contain a special message from God too. Apparently, the message is that God not only heard Hagar's affliction, but that He is, by His very nature, a God who "hears" and responds to the afflictions of human beings. Ishmael himself was to be a divinely appointed carrier of that message, embedded in his own name, throughout the rest of his life, and even after his death (because his name is recorded in the Scriptures), to the end of time. How significant! Thus both Hagar and Ishmael have been permanently incorporated into God's plans as everlasting witnesses to a key divine attribute.

Just to clarify: yes, I know that God's primary promise flows through Isaac, not Ishmael; and it is through Isaac that Jesus Christ was brought forth. Yet according to Genesis 16:7-11, Ishmael has a role in prophetic history too. And above all, we must never forget that our Savior died on the cross for Jews, and Arabs too.

Both groups need the same Savior.

To be continued...

The Muslim Question Revisited (1)

"Allah is great!" shouted the hijackers of United Flight 93 before crashing the doomed airplane into a Pennsylvania field on September 11, 2001. Five months later, hooded executioners repeated the same words before brutally beheading American journalist Daniel Pearl in front of a video camera. In March of 2004, a sequence of backpack bombs exploded in Madrid, Spain, killing nearly 200 people. In July of 2005, more bombs exploded in London. For those who study terrorist activities, such horrors are just the proverbial "tip of the iceberg." Similar atrocities continue to this day being committed around the world.

And Muslims are fueling most of them.

It's an incontrovertible fact that the vast majority of terrorist organizations existing today have been founded by Muslims, are funded by Muslims, are operated by Muslims, and that 98% of all terrorists are, you guessed it, Muslims. Is it any wonder that millions of Americans are afraid of Muslims?

The reason is obvious.

The film, Obsession: Radical Islam's War against the West (2006) is frightening. Produced by Clarion Fund and discussed on both Fox News and CNN, Obsession plainly documents the very real threat of Islamic militants. "Death to Israel! Death to America!" scream Allah's loyalists. They train children as suicide bombers. Their goal is global domination. They will stop at nothing, nothing. These radicals have no qualms about strapping explosives onto their bodies and detonating themselves amidst crowds of innocent civilians. They think they will soar to heaven when the die.
  • They love Jihad.
  • They are soldiers of Mohammed.
  • They follow the Koran.
  • They kill for Allah.

It is because of these fearful realities that I, Steve Wohlberg, used to believe - like many Americans, Christians, and Jews firmly believe today - that most Muslims are either violent themselves, or are at least supportive of violence against non-Muslims. For a number of years, arguments for this view appeared overwhelmingly compelling to me. I have read many books that seemed to support this conclusion. In my personal library are titles like, The Islamic Invasion, by Robert Morey, Why I left Jihad, by Walid Shoebat, and Preachers of Hate, by Kenneth Timmerman. No doubt, there is much truth about the Jihadist threat in these works. And yet, whether these authors intended to communicate this or not, their books only strengthened my personal belief that, when push comes to shove, a genuinely devoted Muslim person is really a dangerous person. My thinking went like this: Most terrorist acts are committed by Muslims, Muslim terrorists find their inspiration for violence in the Koran, the Muslim Bible, and thus most Muslims, if they really believe the Koran, must favor terrorism. It's a no-brainer.

Such reasoning seemed, well, supremely reasonable.

But then something happened in August of 2007 that challenged my thinking. At a Christian convention a stranger handed me a copy of a book entitled, Islam: God's Forgotten Blessing, by Stephen Dickie. Shortly thereafter, a friend and supporter of the ministry that I direct (White Horse Media) mailed to me a second copy of the same book, urging me to read it. Honestly, I didn't like the title. Forgotten blessing? I mused. Hardly. Dickie is probably a liberal with his head in the sand.

Both copies sat on my bookshelf for almost a year. Then one day, in response to a still small voice inside my head, I picked up one copy and began to read it. Unexpectedly, the book captured my attention immediately. "There are over one billion Muslims in the world," Dickie reported, "Doesn't God love them too?" This simple question startled me. The most famous verse in the Bible floated into my head. "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son…" (John 3:16) As a Christian minister, I knew this verse so well. I also knew that when Jesus said, "God so loved the world," that this must mean the Muslim world too.

Then Dickie dropped this bombshell: "Only 8-10% of all Muslims are terrorists, or are even sympathetic to terrorism." This shocked me. He then explained that as we near the return of Jesus Christ, it makes sense that God would make some special effort to reach the Muslim world with the message of His love. I then thought about my current belief that most Muslims are evil. Is this a fair evaluation? I asked myself. Will such an attitude help me befriend and communicate with Joe Muslim?

I shook my head. Nope.

I kept reading.

When I finished Dickie's book my thoughts about Muslims generally had been turned upside down. But let me clarify something. What affected me most was not Stephen Dickie's reasoning - which to my astonishment was far from liberal - but rather how he proved his points straight from the Bible. This made the deepest impression on me because, simply put, I believe God's Book.

For the next few months I gave careful attention to what the Bible actually said about "Ishmael," Abraham's firstborn son, "the Father of the Arabs." Next I looked at some of Ishmael's descendants, as described in the Scriptures. Then I restudied some key biblical prophecies, especially Revelation 9, which describes the 5th and 6th trumpets. Finally I researched more carefully "the third woe" spoken of in Revelation 11:14. A deep conviction grew in my heart. White Horse Media should produce a TV series with Stephen Dickie about this!

Dickie's email address was nestled at the back of his book. Tying a short note, I clicked "send." He wrote back right away. Dialogue resulted, a plan quickly developed, and filming dates were fixed. Within a few short weeks, 13 half-hour TV programs had been completed without a glitch, and everyone involved shared a strong sense that this production was under the hand of the Lord. We titled the series, Islam Revisited.

These articles you are now reading contain the main points of that TV series.

I must confess at the outset that I am not an expert in Islamic studies, nor will I ever be. My area of expertise is Bible prophecy. While I remain a learner myself, and I certainly don't have all the answers, I believe strongly that the information contained herein is solidly biblical, and worth reading.

In fact, this information has helped me - as never before - to make sense out of the horrors of September 11, and to see that event as a fulfillment of prophecy. While it doesn't minimize in any way the threat of Islamic terrorism, nor of the evils of terrorism - and make no mistake about it, terrorism is evil - it can help you actually make friends with Muslims, the majority of whom, believe it or not, aren't terrorists.

Get ready for a fascinating journey.

I hope you will stick with me.

To be continued…

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Fundamentalist Islam Resurges

Arabs call the Crusades al-Salibiyyah. The term is highly emotional to them, reminding them of European atrocities committed during the 200-year-long campaign to bring the Holy Land under Catholic control.

To the peoples of the Arab world, those weren't the only crusades. In their minds, two more crusades have followed.

The next crusade was the colonial period when the Arab world came under the control of the British, French and other European powers. This frustrated Arab dreams of unity and brought a sense of inferiority as they were incapable of overthrowing the Europeans for such a long time.

The current crusade is the one that, in the eyes of fundamentalists, most threatens their way of life. It is what is often called American imperialism. Unlike the British and French, Americans have made no attempt to annex an Arab territory as a colony of the United States. Americans themselves were originally under colonial rule and fought a revolutionary war to be rid of it and replace it with the modern American republic, so Americans are not inclined to colonize as did the Europeans of the 19th century.

However, inadvertently, American culture threatens the traditional way of life of all the Islamic peoples. This is a major cause of resentment if not outright hatred toward the United States.

Partly this is the result of technological advancement. Radio and television have brought Western culture into peoples' homes all over the world. American movies are universal; wherever you go in the world they seem to be available. The message they send is not a good one. They depict an immoral and very violent country, far from the reality of many American families—but foreign audiences don't know that. They also depict liberated and scantily clad women and know-it-all children who show contempt for their parents—both highly offensive to Islamic values.

The pervasiveness of Western culture has only worsened in recent years with the introduction of satellite television. Now more people can watch Western movies and television shows, resulting in increased anti-Western feeling.

Additionally, people throughout the Arab world can now see nightly news footage of Palestinian suffering, for which they blame the United States. The logic is simple—Israel kills Palestinians, America supports Israel, therefore blame America.

Because America is already perceived as a violent country, it is considered responsible for the violence. Exacerbating feelings further has been American military action against Muslims, seen as an anti-Islamic stance on the part of the United States.

The fact that the United States and its allies supported Muslims against the Serbs and Croats in the Balkan wars of the 1990s is overlooked. From the perspective of many in the Muslim world, the American liberation of Afghans from the oppressive Taliban regime in Afghanistan in 2001-2002 and the Iraq war to remove Saddam Hussein from power in 2003 were simply attacks on fellow Muslims. It should be remembered that many countries do not allow freedom of the press or the airwaves, and news there is usually controlled and heavily slanted. This is true throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds.

Roots of Islamic extremism

Such factors have contributed to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism. It's not a new phenomenon. As with other religions, fundamentalists come and go. This has been the case with Islam as it has been with nominal Christianity.

In the 18th century, Ibn Abdul Wahhab (1703-1792) was born in what is now Riyadh in Saudi Arabia. His followers, who form a Sunni sect, are known as Wahhabis. They are the most extreme of all the branches of Islam—violent, intolerant and fanatical. Their rise to prominence in Arabia was not the result of the European Crusades, but rather the decadence of the Ottoman Sultans. Ibn Abdul Wahhab established a state in the Arabian Peninsula that was modeled after the Ummah of the seventh century, an Islamic community that would live by the sharia, Islamic law.

Wahhabism is still the dominant religion of Saudi Arabia, and it has many followers in the Persian Gulf states. It is from this area that the terrorists came who staged the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center in New York. It has been said that not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Wahhabis. Although this is an overstatement, it is true that most of the mosques in Western countries are financed by the Saudis, with the imams teaching their adherents the Wahhabi interpretation of the Koran. As early as 1801, the followers of Wahhab were killing all who opposed them—they fell upon the Shiite city of Karbala that year and killed 2,000 innocent civilians.

Fundamentalism, however, was not confined to Arabia. Later in the same century the British fought a man claiming to be the Mahdi in Sudan, another fundamentalist who wanted to unite all Arabs in a holy war against the infidels invading from the West. The British defeated him and continued to dominate the area until after World War II.

Fundamentalists strike back

Islamic fundamentalism was to affect the West again in 1979. This time the United States was the target as America's most powerful ally in the region was overthrown by fundamentalist masses. The shah of Iran had been pro-Western and, with the help of the United States, had built up his forces to become the strongest military power in the Persian Gulf, the oil-rich area of vital economic and strategic interest to all the Western world.

The shah was overthrown by followers of the extremist Shiite Ayatollah Khomeini. Militant students took over the American embassy in Tehran and held dozens of American embassy employees hostage for 444 days. The West feared that Islamic extremism would spread to other countries in the region.

That was also the year in which the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. Forces there had overthrown their king in 1973 and eventually a procommunist government took control. When this, too, was overthrown, Moscow intervened. Their intervention and a costly, protracted, demoralizing war led directly to the collapse of the Soviet Union a little over a decade later.

The United States, concerned about Soviet advances around the world, helped the Afghans rebel against Soviet domination. They began supplying arms through Muslim Pakistan to the Afghan mujahadin, the guerrilla forces who were led by Osama bin Laden. Eventually the Soviets were defeated, their country collapsed and Afghanistan came under the control of Sunni fundamentalists called the Taliban ("students," referring to those who were taught in Islamic seminaries, or madrasas). With the collapse of the Soviet Union, vast lands in Central Asia broke away from Russia and became independent Islamic republics, thereby further increasing the number of Islamic nations around the world.

Islamic fundamentalists were quickly becoming a major force throughout the Islamic world. They especially appealed to poor people frustrated and angered by leaders who often lived a lavish lifestyle while their people suffered in poverty and oppression. Similarly, in Western nations, Islamic fundamentalists proselytize among the poor and in prisons where they have gained many recruits. Throughout the Arab world people grew tired of their dictatorial regimes that had replaced the corrupt kings. The new presidents had turned out to be no different.

Fundamentalists soon learned that power cannot always be achieved through the democratic process. In Algeria they won the election in 1992, replacing the Arab nationalist government that had led Algeria to independence from France 30 years earlier—following an eight-year rebellion. After 30 years, the economic conditions of the people had only worsened with many, ironically, having to leave for France just to survive.

The fundamentalists seemed better organized and were certainly more honest. But the military stepped in to stop fundamentalist rule. Since then, Algeria has been plagued by frequent terrorist attacks by the forces of fundamentalism, and more than 100,000 Algerians have been killed. French support for the military action only increased resentment and distrust of the West—all the Western talk of democracy seemed to count for little when it mattered.

Shifting tide against the United States

The 1990s saw rising bitterness directed at the United States, now the dominant Western force and the world's only remaining superpower.

The U.S.-led Persian Gulf War against Iraq in 1991 received a great deal of support from other Arab nations. Iraq's leader, Saddam Hussein, had sent his forces into neighboring Kuwait, annexing the small oil-producing nation. His justification for this invasion went back to the days of the Ottoman Empire when what is now Kuwait was part of an administrative zone of the empire that included a large part of Iraq.

The United States and its allies defeated Iraq, but fears of Saddam Hussein remained because Iraq was known to possess weapons of mass destruction, such as chemical and biological weapons, and was aggressively pursuing development of nuclear weapons. By the time this fear came to a head with the 2003 Iraq War, the United States found that many allies of the first Gulf War were no longer supportive. In the interim, the world had changed.

The great turning point was Sept. 11, 2001. As with the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in the previous century, this was to change everything. The world has not been the same since.

Immediately following the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, D.C., when terrorists flew hijacked airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the world was generally sympathetic toward America. But within a year after the United States responded with its war on terror, demonstrating its awesome military power in Afghanistan and looking ahead to possible conflicts with what President Bush called the "Axis of Evil," in the eyes of many America's role had changed from victim to villain.

Suppressed resentment against the world's dominant superpower and fear of isolation and possible terrorism over being too closely allied to the United States contributed to international rejection of America's role as the world's policeman. Increasingly others, even including some Americans, began blaming the United States for Sept. 11, claiming it was a justified response to American foreign policy.

In 2003, in the eyes of many Muslims and their leaders, America was setting a precedent by invading Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein. If one president could be removed, all the other leaders in the region felt they likewise could be removed by U.S. military force. Additionally, public anger at the suffering of the Palestinians had risen with access to satellite television—and especially al-Jazeera, the first Arabic-language satellite station broadcasting from Qatar in the Persian Gulf.

Islamic fundamentalism gains ground

Well before Sept. 11 the threat to the United States from Islamic terrorism was becoming apparent. An article in the November-December 1998 issue of Foreign Affairs quotes from a declaration against the West issued by Osama bin Laden and other militants (see "Anger Mounts Following Gulf War").

Their demands were for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Saudi Arabia—the land of Mecca and Medina, the two holiest cities of Islam. They also called for an end to the bombing of Iraq and the UN sanctions imposed against that country following the Gulf War. And, thirdly, they condemned American support for Israel against the Palestinians. (After victory in the Iraq War, the United States addressed all three grievances, announcing it would withdraw its troops from Saudi Arabia, lifting sanctions against Iraq and pursuing a new peace plan for Israel and the Palestinians.)

Following Sept. 11 America suffered further setbacks as Islamic fundamentalists made additional gains in a number of countries. Pakistan's leader, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, a supporter of Washington's war on terror, saw his country elect an Islamic government, although the general retained overall control of the country.

Surprisingly, almost 80 years after the overthrow of the sultan and the declaration of an Islamic republic, Turkey also elected an Islamic party majority in the November 2002 election. Other countries throughout the region likewise have experienced gains by fundamentalists.

Egypt's President Anwar Sadat was assassinated in 1982 by Islamic fundamentalists, who 15 years later massacred foreign tourists visiting some of Egypt's ancient monuments in an effort to undermine the national economy by destroying the tourism industry.

In Indonesia, the world's most populous Islamic country, fundamentalists have been killing Christians, and in late 2002 a bombing on the Hindu island of Bali killed almost 200 Western tourists, half of them Australians. In India and the Indian-administered section of Kashmir, Muslim fundamentalists have attacked Hindus and Christians, deliberately trying to provoke conflict between Pakistan and India, two of the world's recent nuclear powers.

In Africa, also, Islamic fundamentalism has left its mark. In Sudan, the Muslims of the north actively persecute the Christians of the south, even taking thousands of them into slavery. In Nigeria's northern Muslim states, sharia law has been introduced, and the most popular name given to newborn boys since Sept. 11, 2001, has been Osama in honor of Osama bin Laden.

One factor in this growth of Islamic fundamentalism is the high birthrate in Islamic countries. In most economically backward countries half the people are young people, as couples tend to have six to eight children. As economic policies in these nations often restrict business activity rather than encourage it, many young people cannot find jobs.

Without a means to support a family, the young men cannot marry. The promise of instantly available young virgins upon death as a martyr in a jihad, or holy war, is tempting, so they believe they have nothing to lose in sacrificing themselves to advance Islamic aims. As an additional incentive, some Islamic governments have given thousands of dollars to the surviving family, a princely sum in the slums of refugee camps.

Dilemma for the West

However, poverty is not the main cause of the problem. Almost all the Sept. 11 suicide bombers came from affluent backgrounds, and Osama bin Laden came from one of the wealthiest families in Saudi Arabia. Many other factors have contributed to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism and subsequent terrorism, including the Israeli-Palestinian problem and the domination of American culture.

Further American intervention in the region is likely to only feed the flames of fundamentalism further in the long run. Not one country in the Arab world can be said to be politically stable. All are at risk from fundamentalists. America really is caught in a no-win situation. The U.S. military may win the wars, but America is unlikely to effectively win the peace.

A further complication for the United States and other countries, particularly those of Western Europe, is the presence of Islamic fundamentalists within their own borders, largely the result of changes to immigration laws since World War II. Interestingly, while most Western nations allow immigration from Muslim countries and allow Muslims to become citizens, no Islamic nation allows people from Christian countries to permanently enter and become citizens unless they convert to Islam. The followers of Islam are aware that their religion and Western secular liberalism are incompatible.

Further conflict between the Islamic world and the West is inevitable—and foretold in Bible prophecy, as we'll see in the next chapter.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

The Coming of Islam

The descendants of Ishmael lived in relative obscurity throughout the period of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah and the Assyrian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek and Roman Empires. They mostly kept to themselves in the Arabian Peninsula where desert life was hard, frequently fighting among themselves. But this changed early in the seventh century, less than 600 years after the time of Jesus Christ, when the most famous of Ishmael's descendants came on the scene.

Until the early 600s the Arabs were idol worshippers. The great temple in Mecca had 365 idols (one for each day of the year) and was a source of considerable revenue for local merchants who relied on pilgrims visiting the site for their income.

This religious landscape was to change dramatically with the prophet Muhammad and the religion he founded, Islam.

Muhammad (sometimes spelled Mohammed or Mahomet) was of the Hashemite family (in Arabic, Beni Hashim) of the powerful Koreish (or Quraish) tribe, which controlled the pagan temple in Mecca. According to Islamic belief, it was near Mecca, at Mt. Hira, that the archangel Gabriel first appeared to Muhammad in A.D. 610, revealing wisdom from God. This and subsequent revelations form the Koran (or Quran), the holy scriptures of Islam, a book roughly the length of the New Testament.

Muhammad, whose name means "highly praised," became a courageous and determined preacher of monotheism, the belief in one God, a belief that threatened the commercial prosperity of other members of his tribe. Their attempts to have him killed failed, and in a short time Muhammad brought an end to the polytheistic idolatry of the area, replacing it with Islam (literally meaning "surrender" or "submission" to the one true God, Allah).

Muhammad's preaching achieved something that had eluded Ishmael's descendants from the beginning—unity, thereby enabling them to become a great nation that could spread out and influence other nations.

From these lowly beginnings in the desert of the Arabian Peninsula, Islam has spread throughout the world. Today 57 countries are in the Islamic Conference, comprising more than a quarter of all the nations on earth.

Although 22 of them are Arab nations, many of which are populated with descendants of Ishmael, another 35 nations also are either exclusively or significantly Islamic. These range geographically from West Africa across the center of the world to Indonesia, a wide belt of nations that identify with each other as followers of Islam.

In addition, millions more Muslims, followers of Islam, live in North America and Western Europe. The religion continues to expand rapidly due to a high birthrate and aggressive proselytizing.

Today Islam (pronounced Is-LAM, with the emphasis on the second syllable) has around 1.3 billion followers. They all worship Allah (similar emphasis on the second syllable), whom they consider to be the one true God. They worship in mosques, with Friday as their chosen day of worship, though it is also permissible for adherents to work on that day.

Their one-sentence creed, called the shahadah ("testimony") is only eight words in Arabic—La illaha ila Allah, wa Muhammadun rasul Allah—meaning "There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is His Prophet." A solemn and sincere recitation of these words is the sole requirement for being a Muslim. The word Muslim (or Moslem) means "one who submits (to Allah)."

Muslims date their years from the hijrah (sometimes spelled hejira or hegira), Muhammad's flight from Mecca to Medina in A.D. 622. As the Muslim year is set according to the lunar calendar, there are 354 or 355 days in each year, which means that their year is about 11 days shorter than a year in the Western world, which is based on the Gregorian solar calendar. This means that Islamic festivals fall on different days each year according to the Gregorian calendar and gradually work their way back through the Gregorian year.

Muhammad died on June 8, A.D. 632, leaving no male heir and no designated successor. The result was chaos and confusion throughout the Islamic Empire, which after only a decade had already grown to one third the size of the present 48 continental United States.

Only one child by his beloved first wife Khadija had survived him, the beautiful Fatima. She grew to adulthood, married and bore children who also survived. It is through Fatima that all Muhammad's present descendants, called sharifs and sayyids, trace their ancestry. Fatima's husband, Ali ibn Abi Talib, first cousin and adopted son to Muhammad, was also his first convert after Khadija. Ali and Fatima had two young sons at the time of Muhammad's death.

As the nearest blood relative, many thought that Ali should be Muhammad's successor as their leader. After a great deal of argument, he was rejected in favor of a wealthy Meccan cloth merchant who had been an early convert and Muhammad's companion on his famous camel-back flight 10 years earlier. His name was Abu Bakr. He was also the father of Muhammad's favorite wife, Ayesha, and had been appointed to take the place of the prophet leading public prayers at the time of Muhammad's last illness.

The revelations had been to Muhammad, so Abu Bakr was not fully succeeding Muhammad. However, he was given authority over the secular political and administrative functions of the empire, with the title "Khalifah rasul Allah" meaning "Successor to the Messenger of God." In English the title is usually shortened to "caliph" and is given to the head of state in Muslim-governed countries. The office of Islamic Caliphate remained an Islamic institution right down to the creation of the Turkish Republic in 1924, when it was abolished by the secular government of Kemal Ataturk.

Although the transition following the death of Muhammad was sudden and unexpected and caused some bad feeling among the followers of Ali, Fatima's husband, the tribes remained united under Abu Bakr.

Rapid expansion of the Islamic Empire
Before he died Abu Bakr appointed Omar ibn al-Khattab as his successor. Caliph Omar (or Umar) was the first caliph to assume the illustrious title Amir al-Muminin, meaning "Commander of the Faithful." It was during his 10-year reign that the first great wave of Islamic territorial expansion occurred as the children of Ishmael pushed outward in all directions from their ancient desert homeland.

Caliph Omar was an able commander of his troops and proved a formidable foe to the two great superpowers of his day, the Byzantine and Persian Empires. The former was the Eastern Roman Empire, which had developed out of the older Roman Empire after Constantine, in the fourth century, established a new capital in Byzantium (renaming it Constantinople, after himself)—now Istanbul, Turkey. It controlled Asia Minor, the Aegean Peninsula, much of North Africa and the Near East.

To the northeast of the Arabian Peninsula lay the Persian, or Sassanid, Empire. The Persian and Byzantine Empires were constantly fighting each other, weakening them and making them vulnerable to the new, vigorous, zealous and youthful Islamic Empire coming out of Arabia. The Sassanid Empire fell, but the Byzantine remained as a continually threatened and shrinking empire, finally falling to Muslim Turks in 1453.

To cries of Allahu Akbar ("God is Great!"), the Islamic call to arms, the camel- and horse-mounted Arab warriors were formidable opponents, defeating all the forces that were sent against them. Not since the days of Alexander the Great had there been such a force, conquering all before it so quickly. A century of conquest lay before them. Syria and the Holy Land were taken in 635-6; the area of Iraq, the following year; Egypt and Persia, four years later.

Jerusalem was their greatest prize, captured in 638. Called Al-Kuds in Arabic, meaning "the Holy," Jerusalem remains the third-holiest city of Islam, after Mecca and Medina. Muslims believe that Muhammad ascended to heaven on his winged steed Burak from the rock that is visible inside the Dome of the Rock, built in the late seventh century and one of the most architecturally magnificent buildings on earth.

Muslims also believe this is where Abraham came to sacrifice his son—the son, however, being Ishmael rather than Isaac as the Bible attests (Genesis 22:1-14). Built on the great platform of the Temple Mount constructed centuries earlier by Herod the Great, the Dome of the Rock and the surrounding area is today the most bitterly contested piece of real estate on earth.

Within a century after the death of Muhammad, the Arab Empire stretched from the Middle East across North Africa to Spain in the west and eastward across Central Asia to India. One of their advances even reached the gates of Paris before being halted by Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours near Poitiers in 732, exactly 100 years after Muhammad's death.

Rapid Muslim expansion now halted until the 12th century, when another great expansion of Islam took place under the Sufis (Muslim mystics) who spread Islam throughout India, Central Asia, Turkey and sub-Saharan Africa. Muslim traders helped spread the religion even further, to Indonesia, the Malay Peninsula and China.

"Islam's essential egalitarianism within the community of the faithful and its official discrimination against the followers of other religions won rapid converts," notes the Encyclopaedia Britannica (15th Edition, Vol. 9, p. 912, "Islam"). Although Jews and Christians, as "people of the Book" were tolerated, they had to pay a special tax called jizyah. However, "pagans ... were required to either accept Islam or die" (ibid.).

Following the assassination of the Caliph Omar in November 644 while leading prayers in the mosque of Medina, a body of electors once again bypassed Ali when choosing a successor. The caliphate was bestowed on Othman ibn Affan, who had been an early convert to Islam and a close companion of the prophet.

During his period of rule the Koran was completed in its present form. Previously, most of its contents had simply been memorized in the heads of Muhammad's followers (Muhammad, himself illiterate, had never written them down). These were now collected by a team of men authorized to put the sacred writings together, under the leadership of the Islamic scholar Zayd ibn Thabit.

Muslims believe the Koran is the literal word of God (Kalimat Allah), not the words of Muhammad. The first words of the Koran are Bism'illah ir-Rahman ir-Rahim, meaning "In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate."

Islam splits over succession


Othman ruled 12 years (644-656) before being assassinated in Medina. His assassination heralded open religious and political conflicts within the Islamic community that continue to this day.

After Othman's death, leadership of the community finally fell to Ali, Fatima's aging husband, who had been living in retirement as a scholar. To his followers, Ali was the first and only lawful caliph. Most Muslims accepted him as the fourth caliph, but many were bitterly opposed to his rule.

The empire was to suffer continual political and religious strife, uprisings and rebellions. Five years later Ali, too, was assassinated. Before any of his sons could be appointed as successor, Othman's nephew, head of the Umayyad (or Omayyad) branch of the Koreish tribe, assumed control, bringing the dispute between the factions to a head.

Ali's followers believed that all caliphs must be descended from Ali as Muhammad's closest blood relative. This group was called the "party of Ali" (in Arabic, the Shiat Ali, or Shiites). The majority believed that anybody could be appointed caliph, regardless of lineage. This group was called the Sunni Muslims, sunna being the "path" or the "way" of the Prophet. In contrast to the Shiites, the Sunnis have generally accepted the rule of the caliphs.

Violence followed in 680 when Ali's son Hussein, a grandson of Muhammad, was killed along with 72 of his relatives and companions at Karbala in what is now Iraq. The Shiites now had a martyr. They grew in numbers and resolve and were increasingly embittered at the dominance of the Sunni Muslims. This animosity continues to the present day.

The majority Sunnis make up about 85 percent of all Muslims, and the Shiites (or Shia) constitute the remainder. Although they agree on the fundamentals of Islam, political, theological and philosophical differences have further widened the gap between the two. Complicating things even further has been the tendency among the Shiite Muslims to break up into various sects.

Today, the Shiites are the dominant force in Iran and the biggest single religious community in Lebanon and Iraq. Remembering the fanaticism of the Iranian Revolution that overthrew the shah in 1979, many people think Shiites are inclined toward terrorism. However, most anti-Western terrorists come from the Wahhabi sect of Sunni Islam, which originated in Saudi Arabia in the 18th century.

One of the appeals of Islam is the emphasis on Ummah or community. "Though there have been many Islamic sects and movements, all followers are bound by a common faith and a sense of belonging to a single community" (ibid., p. 912). This sense of community has only been strengthened in the last 200 years during the period of Western supremacy. Achieving Arab and Islamic unity is very much a desire of Muslims in today's world.

Ishmael becomes the prophesied "great nation"
After Ali's death the Umayyads turned the caliphate into a hereditary office, ruling from Damascus for almost a century until 750. During this time most of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal) was conquered along with what was left of North Africa. To the east, Islamic armies swept over Central Asia toward India and China. Before the end of their period of rule, the Muslims built an empire that was larger than Rome's, converting millions to Islam.

The Umayyads were replaced by the Abbasid dynasty, whose 37 caliphs ruled from Baghdad for five centuries (750-1258). At this time, while much of Europe was still in the Dark Ages (isolated in no small part by hostile Muslims along its borders), the Islamic world was a great civilization, preserving the literature and learning of the ancient world, leading the world in knowledge and understanding of mathematics, chemistry, physics, astronomy, geography and medicine.

As had been divinely promised to Abraham and Hagar concerning their son so many centuries earlier, Ishmael truly did become a "great nation" (Genesis 17:20; 21:18)—one of the greatest empires the world has ever known.

Like all civilizations, however, the Abbasid dynasty came to an end after falling into a slow decay and decline. During this period, as central authority waned, the unity of Islam was shattered, a problem that impedes Muslims to this day. The deathblow for the empire came when the Mongol hordes descended on Baghdad in 1258, killing the last caliph, slaughtering the city's inhabitants and ending the empire.

The Crusades: Battle for the Holy Land

During the reigns of the Abbasid caliphs, a major clash occurred between Islam and Catholic Europe. With the expansion of Islam into the Iberian Peninsula and the attempt to conquer France, there had already been conflict between the two, but the wresting of Jerusalem from the forces of Islam on July 15, 1099, was the beginning of a long and protracted period of rivalry between the two religious forces.

The European Crusaders pillaged, raped, murdered and enslaved the peoples of Jerusalem in a frenzy of carnage that both Jews and Muslims remember to this day. The sacred Dome of the Rock was taken over and turned into a church, with the Christian cross replacing the Islamic crescent. Muslims were incensed and vowed to retake the city from the infidels (meaning "unbelievers," originally a Latin word used by Catholics to label Muslims).

Not until Oct. 2, 1187, were Islamic forces able to take back control of Jerusalem, under the leadership of Saladin (Salah ad-Din, meaning "Righteousness of the Faith"), the sultan of Egypt and Syria. Saladin proclaimed jihad (holy war) to retake Palestine from the enemies of Islam.

The golden cross at the top of the Dome of the Rock was replaced by the Muslim crescent, but Saladin did not seek revenge on his opponents. Instead, he treated both enemy soldiers and the civilian population with mercy and kindness—a stark contrast to the Europeans who had slaughtered tens of thousands when they took the city.

There were to be more Crusades for another century, briefly retaking Jerusalem from 1229 to 1239 and 1243 to 1244, but the forces of the cross eventually had to leave the Holy Land to Muslims. Not until 1917, during World War I, were Western Christians again able to retake Jerusalem, and then they kept control of the city for only three decades.


The rise of the Ottoman Empire
The next great power in the region was that of the Ottoman Turks, who seized control of Constantinople in 1453, finally destroying the collapsing Byzantine Empire founded by Rome more than a millennium earlier. The Turks, an Islamic but non-Arab people, took control of Jerusalem in 1517 and were to dominate the Middle East for the following four centuries.

The Ottomans expanded rapidly into southeastern Europe and on to the gates of Vienna before being pushed back toward the end of the 17th century. A period of decline followed in the 19th century with nations throughout the Balkans and North Africa breaking away from Ottoman rule.

The Arabs resented Turkish control and waited patiently for an opportunity to regain their independence and the former days of glory.

Ishmael's sons would be heard from again.